Case 2400081/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Williams v Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 2400081/2019
- Decision date
- 29 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne MEMBERS
- Panel members
- Mrs A Ramsden, Mr W K Partington
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr B Williams brought a claim against Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust arising from alleged detriments connected with a flexible working application or a proposal to make one. The tribunal sat at Liverpool before Employment Judge Horne, with Mrs A Ramsden and Mr W K Partington as members, and gave judgment unanimously on 18 October 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexible working | The tribunal treated the case as allegations of detriments connected with a flexible working application or a proposal to make one. It held that 13 allegations occurring before 21 August 2018 were out of time, and that it had no jurisdiction to consider them. For 11 of those allegations, the tribunal said that even if it had jurisdiction, it would have found no detriment on the ground alleged. The 4 allegations said to have occurred after 21 August 2018 were also found not to have been on the ground that the claimant had made, or proposed to make, a flexible working application. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.