Case 2400093/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Dash v Athena Healthcare Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400093/2020
- Decision date
- 2 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Dash
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response, although it wrote to the tribunal confirming service of the claim. The claimant had worked for the respondent and its subsidiary companies, including Athena Care (Ormskirk) Ltd trading as Abbey Wood Lodge, in various roles across the group. On 19 August 2019 she was made redundant from a new administrator role she was due to start that day, instead of her earlier Training and Compliance roles.
The tribunal found there had been no proper warning or consultation about redundancy and no sufficient consideration of suitable alternative employment. It held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,246.50, calculated by reference to three years' continuous service when aged over 41 and an average weekly pay of £277.00, but the redundancy payment already received of £961.88 was credited, leaving £284.62 payable on that element.
On compensation, the tribunal accepted that the claimant had fully mitigated her loss and had found lower-paid temporary employment. Applying Polkey v AE Dayton Services (HL), it limited loss of earnings and collateral benefits compensation to the 21-week period in the claimant's Schedule of Loss to 7 February 2020, awarding £1,006.88 for that loss and a further £500 for loss of statutory rights, making a compensatory award of £1,506.88. It also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages on termination and ordered payment of £104.50 gross. The tribunal noted that the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures does not apply to redundancies.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages on termination and ordered the respondent to pay £104.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £105 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy. It awarded a basic award of £1,246.50, credited the redundancy payment received of £961.88 against that sum, leaving £284.62, and awarded a compensatory award of £1,506.88. | Upheld | — | £1,792 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,896
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,247
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,507
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Polkey v AE Dayton Services (HL)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.