Case 2400095/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Walsh v Itecco Limited (In Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400095/2024
- Decision date
- 7 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Walsh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the respondent company was in administration. The Tribunal stated that neither the Administrator's consent nor the court's permission had been obtained for the proceedings to continue as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The Tribunal also recorded that on 16 August it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason, and the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The GOV.UK listing category includes redundancy, but the short judgment does not describe the pleaded claim in detail. The claim was struck out because the respondent was in administration and required consent or permission had not been obtained, and because the claimant had not given an acceptable reason after being asked why the claim should not be struck out as not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.