Case 2400098/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Wilford v APWW Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2400098/2019
- Decision date
- 24 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter Members
- Venue
- Liverpool
- Panel members
- Mrs A Ramsden, Mrs JC Fletcher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Wilford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Liverpool on 23 September 2019 before Employment Judge Shotter with lay members Mrs A Ramsden and Mrs JC Fletcher. The judgment records that the claimant was represented by his father, Mr K Wilford, and the respondent by Mr J Gilbert, consultant.
The tribunal's only recorded disposal was that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not set out findings on the merits of the pleaded complaints, and it does not record any substantive liability reasoning.
No monetary award was made. The tribunal also recorded that there would be no further order as to costs.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment does not enumerate the individual claims; this claim type is inferred from the published case listing category 'Age Discrimination'. The tribunal recorded that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not enumerate the individual claims; this claim type is inferred from the published case listing category 'Breach of Contract'. The tribunal recorded that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment does not enumerate the individual claims; this claim type is inferred from the published case listing category 'Redundancy and Unfair Dismissal'. The tribunal recorded that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not enumerate the individual claims; this claim type is inferred from the published case listing category 'Redundancy and Unfair Dismissal'. The tribunal recorded that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.