Case 2400116/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Ashworth v The School Of Military Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400116/2020
- Decision date
- 2 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Ashworth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent had not presented a response. On the information before the judge, the claim succeeded without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,350.00.
The judgment includes the standard Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 notice, which states the relevant decision day as 2 March 2020, the calculation day as 3 March 2020, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%. No separate interest figure was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response. The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,350.00. | Upheld | — | £1,350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,350
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.