Case 2400123/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Francis-Goss v The Governing Body of Archers Brook SEMH Residential School — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400123/2020
- Decision date
- 27 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Francis-Goss
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Francis-Goss brought a breach of contract claim against The Governing Body of Archers Brook SEMH Residential School. The case was heard at Liverpool on 18 March 2020 before Employment Judge Buzzard sitting alone, with the respondent not in attendance.
The tribunal dismissed the breach of contract claim on the basis that it fell outside the tribunal's jurisdiction because the claimant continued to be an employee of the respondent. No remedy was awarded.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No discrimination, unfair dismissal, redundancy, wages, or other substantive claims were recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the tribunal held it lacked jurisdiction to consider the breach of contract claim while the claimant remained an employee of the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.