Case 2400136/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Trevaskis v Puddington Parish Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 2400136/2024
- Decision date
- 20 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Serr REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Trevaskis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing on 4 March 2025 was a preliminary hearing in public before Employment Judge Serr, with Mr L Trevaskis appearing in person and the respondent neither attending nor being represented. The Tribunal struck out the respondent's response under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued, and under Rule 38(1)(c) because the respondent had not complied with the Tribunal Rules or a Tribunal order.
This judgment does not contain findings on the merits of the underlying employment claims and does not record any award or remedy. It is limited to the procedural decision to strike out the response; the reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the merits of any substantive employment claim. It strikes out the respondent's response under Rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued and under Rule 38(1)(c) because the respondent had not complied with the Tribunal Rules or a Tribunal order. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d)
- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.