Case 2400146/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Moore v Newbank Garden Centre Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400146/2022
- Decision date
- 2 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Cowen REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester remotely by CVP on 11 and 12 July 2022 before Employment Judge L Cowen, dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. The written record states that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and that the claim was not well-founded.
The tribunal also dismissed the claim described in the judgment as 'unauthorised deduction from wages and/or breach of contract'. The written record states that this claim was not well-founded. The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual procedure.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment also refers to this claim as 'unauthorised deduction from wages'. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal dealt with this together with the wages claim, using the wording 'and/or breach of contract'. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.