Case 2400154/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Carney Mr C Reid Mr A Rawlinson (snr) Mr S Silvano Mr J Toner Mr S Walker v Liverpool Street Scene Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2400154/2019
- Decision date
- 4 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Carney Mr C Reid Mr A Rawlinson (snr) Mr S Silvano Mr J Toner Mr S Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 3 June 2019, the Tribunal gave each claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The written reasons do not identify separate substantive findings on the underlying claims; the judgment disposes of the case on case-management grounds only.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimants either failed to make written representations or failed to make sufficient representations, and none requested a hearing. On that basis, Regional Employment Judge Parkin struck out the claims. The judgment was sent to the parties on 4 September 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The reasons do not identify a separate outcome by claim type; the judgment strikes out the claims as a result of non-pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The reasons do not identify a separate outcome by claim type; the judgment strikes out the claims as a result of non-pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.