Case 2400155/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Grimes v Flextronics Global Services (Manchester) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400155/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge LEACH
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Grimes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge LEACH issued a rule 52 judgment on 4 May 2020 in case 2400155/2020. The judgment records that the proceedings between Mr R Grimes and Flextronics Global Services (Manchester) Ltd were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or the underlying pleaded issues are set out in the extracted text. The judgment was sent to the parties on 12 May 2020.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim; no separate merits finding is given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim; no separate merits finding is given. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim; no separate merits finding is given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim; no separate merits finding is given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.