Case 2400157/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Hanafin Mr A Rawlinson (jnr) v Liverpool Street Scene Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2400157/2019
- Decision date
- 2 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Hanafin Mr A Rawlinson (jnr)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short joint judgment in case numbers 2400157/2019 and 2400160/2019 concerning Mr B Hanafin and Mr A Rawlinson (jnr) against Liverpool Street Scene Services. The tribunal recorded only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. The judgment was dated 24 July 2019 and sent to the parties on 2 August 2019.
The judgment does not set out the underlying allegations, evidence, or any findings on liability. It records no remedy award and identifies no legal test or further reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. The short judgment does not set out the pleaded claim details; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment says the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. The short judgment does not set out the pleaded claim details; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.