Case 2400157/2020 · Employment Tribunal
H Hanif v Thomas James Havlin — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400157/2020
- Decision date
- 11 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
H Hanif
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claim was struck out. The judgment states that, by letter dated 25 September 2020, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The warning relied on two matters: the claimant had failed to reply to the Tribunal's letters of 6 April 2020 and 14 July 2020, and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations why the claim should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Batten ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying wage claim and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not adjudicate the substantive wage claim; it records that the claim was struck out because the claimant failed to reply to the Tribunal's letters dated 6 April 2020 and 14 July 2020 and did not make sufficient representations in response to the strike-out warning dated 25 September 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.