Case 2400169/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Hlavac v JTD Contracts (Manchester) Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400169/2024
- Decision date
- 25 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Hlavac
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningActing under Rule 21, the tribunal found that JTD Contracts (Manchester) Ltd had failed to pay Mr D Hlavac's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,189.91.
The judgment also recorded that the respondent had breached its duty to give the claimant a written statement of employment particulars. In the absence of any particulars whatsoever, the tribunal applied the higher additional award and ordered a further £1,352.96, calculated as four weeks' pay at £338.24 per week.
The total monetary award was therefore £3,542.87. The written record of the decision was sent on 25 March 2024, and the accompanying interest notice states that if sums remain unpaid after 14 days, interest would run from 26 March 2024 at 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,190 |
| Other | Additional award for breach of the duty to give the claimant a written statement of employment particulars; calculated as four weeks' pay at £338.24 per week because there were no particulars whatsoever. | Upheld | — | £1,353 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,543
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.