Case 2400177/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Hallewell v The Edwards Tavern Company Limited t/a The Hinds Head — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400177/2024
- Decision date
- 12 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Hallewell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt first with time limits on the unfair dismissal and breach of contract complaints. It found that although both complaints were presented outside the applicable time limit, it was not reasonably practicable to do so sooner, and both were presented within a further reasonable period. Those claims were therefore allowed to proceed to the final hearing listed for 9, 10 and 11 April 2025.
The complaint of public interest disclosure detriment under section 47B ERA 1996 was withdrawn and dismissed. No merits findings were made on that complaint in this judgment.
By consent, the holiday pay complaint succeeded. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by not paying for holidays accrued but untaken on the date employment ended, and it ordered payment of £229.78. The claimant was held responsible for any tax or National Insurance on that sum, and the usual interest notice recorded that interest would run from 13 December 2024 at 8% per annum if the award remained unpaid after 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal rejected the respondent's time-limit objection, finding that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the primary time limit and that it was presented within a further reasonable period. The merits of the unfair dismissal claim were left to the final hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal rejected the respondent's time-limit objection, finding that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the primary time limit and that it was presented within a further reasonable period. The merits of the breach of contract claim were left to the final hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The complaint of public interest disclosure (detriment) under section 47B ERA 1996 was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the holiday pay complaint was well-founded. The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £230 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £230
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- within a further reasonable period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.