Case 2400200/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Imogen Street v Saria Edwards — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400200/2022
- Decision date
- 13 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fearon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Imogen Street
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Fearon sat alone at Manchester by CVP on 16 August 2022. The tribunal considered Ms Imogen Street's claims for unlawful deduction of wages, holiday pay, and breach of contract in respect of non-payment of notice pay. It found that it was reasonably practicable for each claim to have been brought within the required time period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been brought within the required time period, but it was not brought in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed because the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been brought within the required time period, but it was not brought in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim concerned non-payment of notice pay and was dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.