Case 2400208/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Banks, Director v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs Held — 2019
- Case reference
- 2400208/2019
- Decision date
- 13 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Banks, Director
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningPiggy B & Sweet Green Tavern Ltd appealed against a Notice of Underpayment issued on 20 December 2018 under s.19C of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. Employment Judge Howard dismissed the appeal, and the Notice of Underpayment remained in effect.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay costs of £2,904.00 to the appellant. The separate interest notice stated the relevant decision day as 13 September 2019 and the calculation day as 14 September 2019, but sums representing costs or expenses were excluded from interest under the notice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Appeal against a Notice of Underpayment issued on 20 December 2018 under s.19C National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The appeal was dismissed and the Notice of Underpayment remained in effect; the tribunal also ordered costs of £2,904.00 to the appellant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,904
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.