Case 2400219/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R F Sumner v Ocs Uk&i Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400219/2024
- Decision date
- 26 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R F Sumner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the correct name of the respondent is OCS UK&I Limited. It issued letters on 1 May 2024 and 16 May 2024 asking the claimant for further information, but no response was received.
By a further letter dated 13 June 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 17 October 2024 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not set out the underlying merits claim, but the case was listed by GOV.UK as an unlawful deduction from wages matter. The Tribunal struck the claim out because the claimant did not respond to requests for further information or make sufficient representations after being given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.