Case 2400232/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Ellis Mr N Whittaker v Pendle Personnel Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2400232/2019
- Decision date
- 1 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Ellis Mr N Whittaker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment in case numbers 2400232/2019, 2400233/2019, 2400250/2019 and 2400251/2019 records that the claimants, Mr G Ellis and Mr N Whittaker, withdrew their claims against Pendle Personnel Limited. Regional Employment Judge Parkin therefore dismissed the proceedings in the judgment dated 25 July 2019, sent to the parties on 1 August 2019.
No findings were made on the merits of the dispute, and the judgment contains no liability analysis, legal test, or remedy award. The record is limited to the procedural disposal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not set out the substantive particulars of the claim; it records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment does not set out the substantive particulars of the claim; it records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not set out the substantive particulars of the claim; it records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not set out the substantive particulars of the claim; it records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.