Case 2400247/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Harter v Waste Recycling & Decommissioning Ltd (in Creditor’s Voluntary Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2400247/2020
- Decision date
- 22 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Harter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 17 March 2021, Employment Judge McDonald, sitting alone at Manchester by CVP, heard Mr E Harter’s claims against Waste Recycling & Decommissioning Ltd (in Creditor’s Voluntary Liquidation). The respondent did not attend. The tribunal upheld three claims: entitlement to statutory redundancy pay, unpaid accrued holiday entitlement, and breach of contract for failure to pay notice pay.
The tribunal awarded the claimant a redundancy payment of £2,362.50. It also found that he was owed payment for ten days of accrued holiday entitlement, assessed at £1,422 gross, and one month’s notice pay, assessed at £3,750 gross. The holiday pay and notice pay awards were to be subject to tax and national insurance deductions before payment of the net amounts.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. It also includes a notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 stating that qualifying sums would carry interest if unpaid after 42 days from the relevant judgment day, but no separate interest amount is quantified in the judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,363 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,422 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,535
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.