Case 2400248/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Hibbard v J S Convenience Stores Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400248/2020
- Decision date
- 6 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Hibbard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs G Hibbard against J S Convenience Stores Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The listed hearing on 17 March 2020 was cancelled.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £3,822.70. It also directed the respondent to account to HMRC for any tax or national insurance contributions due in respect of the grossed-up sum.
The accompanying interest notice stated that sums payable under the judgment would carry interest if not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day. The notice gave the relevant decision day as 6 March 2020 and the calculation day as 7 March 2020, with the stipulated rate of interest stated as 8%. No separate quantified interest award was stated in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £3,822.70 and to account to HMRC for any tax or national insurance contributions due on the grossed-up sum. | Upheld | — | £3,823 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,823
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.