Case 2400276/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Wilcox v Grecian Engineering (Bolton) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400276/2022
- Decision date
- 26 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Wilcox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Phil Allen entered judgment under Rule 21 for Miss C Wilcox against Grecian Engineering (Bolton) Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay the gross sum of £1,242.62.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,045. The judgment cancelled the hearing listed for 4 November 2022.
An accompanying notice stated that sums payable under the judgment would carry interest if not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, and recorded the stipulated rate of interest as 8%.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,242.62. | Upheld | — | £1,243 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,045. | Upheld | — | £1,045 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,288
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.