Case 2400305/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jason Carter v Mabey Hire Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400305/2022
- Decision date
- 28 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jason Carter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard in Liverpool on 26 July 2022 before Employment Judge Liz Ord. The claimant, Mr Jason Carter, did not attend the hearing. The respondent, Mabey Hire Ltd, was represented by Ms J Wilson, the respondent's HR manager.
The judgment records that, because of the claimant's non-attendance at the hearing, all claims were dismissed. No substantive findings on the underlying merits of the pleaded claims are recorded in the short judgment.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 28 July 2022.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that, because the claimant did not attend the hearing, all claims were dismissed. The specific claim type is inferred from the case listing categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that, because the claimant did not attend the hearing, all claims were dismissed. The specific claim type is inferred from the case listing categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that, because the claimant did not attend the hearing, all claims were dismissed. The specific claim type is inferred from the case listing categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.