Case 2400349/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Jeremejeva v Fiza Foods Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2400349/2022
- Decision date
- 7 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms CS Jammeh, Ms C Gallagher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Jeremejeva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs G Jeremejeva was unfairly dismissed under s.99(1) Employment Rights Act and that Fiza Foods Ltd unlawfully discriminated against her on grounds of pregnancy under s.18 and s.39(2)(c) Equality Act 2010. It awarded financial losses for loss of earnings between the date of dismissal and 31 January 2022, finding that she would have been dismissed in any event on that date. The parties agreed the net financial loss figure, after sums already paid, was £1,710.00.
The tribunal also awarded £10,000.00 for injury to feelings. It calculated interest at 8% on the injury to feelings award from 1 December 2021 to 3 March 2023, producing £1,001.64, and interest on the loss of earnings award from 1 January 2022 to 3 March 2023, producing £159.66, for total interest of £1,161.30. It found that no basic award was payable for unfair dismissal because of the claimant’s length of service, and no compensatory award was made for unfair dismissal because the claimant’s recoverable losses had already been covered by the discrimination award.
The tribunal further found that the respondent breached the claimant’s contract by failing to give one week’s notice of dismissal, but it awarded no damages for that breach because the claimant had been paid for the notice period to which she was entitled. The total sum ordered to be paid was £12,871.30.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair under s.99(1) Employment Rights Act, but made no basic award because of the claimant’s length of service and no separate compensatory award because the recoverable losses were fully accounted for in the discrimination award. | Upheld | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal found unlawful discrimination on grounds of pregnancy under s.18 and s.39(2)(c) Equality Act 2010. It awarded £1,710.00 for loss of earnings, £10,000.00 for injury to feelings, and £1,161.30 interest. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £12,871 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract because the respondent failed to give one week’s notice of dismissal, but it awarded no damages because the claimant had been paid in respect of the notice period. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,871
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,710
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.99(1) Employment Rights Act
- s.18 Equality Act 2010
- s.39(2)(c) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.