Case 2400374/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Robinson v Maximus UK Services Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2400374/2024
- Decision date
- 3 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Liverpool on 23 October 2025 before Employment Judge Aspinall, the tribunal dealt with the respondent's application for its costs incurred following postponement of the final hearing that had been listed for three days from 18 November 2024. The application was made under Rule 74(2)(a) and (c) and Rule 74(3).
The tribunal's judgment was that the application failed. No monetary costs award was made in favour of the respondent, and the written record does not include any separate remedial figure.
The document notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard procedure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The respondent's application for its costs incurred following postponement of the final hearing listed for three days from 18 November 2024, brought under Rule 74(2)(a) and (c) and Rule 74(3), failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 74(2)(a)
- Rule 74(2)(c)
- Rule 74(3)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.