Case 2400378/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Philip Parry-Williams v EXL Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400378/2022
- Decision date
- 18 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Philip Parry-Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the hearing and filed no response. Evidence was received from the claimant and accepted. By consent, EXL Group Limited was treated as the correct respondent and the claim against Mr D MacAskill was dismissed. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages of £3,288.45, described as five weeks' salary and car allowance from 25 October 2021 to 26 November 2021, and recorded that £2,000 had already been paid on 29 November 2021, so it ordered payment of the balance of £1,288.45.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of one week's notice and awarded £574.53 net. It found that contractual expenses had not been paid and ordered £98.58. It further found that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of terms under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered £2,176, described as four weeks' pay subject to the statutory cap of £544.
The judgment additionally records that the respondent failed to give an itemised pay statement. No separate monetary order is stated for that finding in the extracted text. The notice appended to the judgment states that interest would be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if any award remained unpaid after 14 days, but no interest figure is set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for 5 weeks' salary and car allowance between 25 October 2021 and 26 November 2021; the tribunal noted that £2,000 had already been paid on 29 November 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,288 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of one week's notice; damages awarded net. | Upheld | — | £575 |
| Breach of contract | Expenses due under the contract of employment were not paid. | Upheld | — | £99 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of terms under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; award described as four weeks' pay subject to the statutory cap of £544. | Upheld | — | £2,176 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to give the claimant an itemised pay statement, but no separate monetary order is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,138
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.