Case 2400390/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Shilton v Clydesdale Bank plc HELD AT: Liverpool — 2025
- Case reference
- 2400390/2022
- Decision date
- 8 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Shilton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Johnson sitting in Liverpool recorded that Ms G Shilton was fairly dismissed by Clydesdale Bank plc on 28 September 2021. The tribunal therefore rejected the unfair dismissal claim and recorded that the claimant was unsuccessful on that complaint.
The judgment also states that the other complaint, disability discrimination, had previously been withdrawn by the claimant on 23 October 2024. On that basis the tribunal said the proceedings were dismissed in their entirety. No monetary award was made and no remedy was recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was fairly dismissed by the respondent on 28 September 2021. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The other complaint of disability discrimination had been previously withdrawn by the claimant on 23 October 2024. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.