Case 2400412/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Gant v Gym Squared Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2400412/2022
- Decision date
- 27 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Gant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent, Gym Squared Limited, was in compulsory liquidation and that permission of the Companies Court would be required to restore it to the Register. By a letter dated 26 January 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant, Mr K Gant, an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any determination of the underlying merits of the pleaded claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separate the underlying pleaded claims; it records that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant did not respond to the tribunal's letter. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not separately determine the merits of any Working Time Regulations complaint; it records that 'the claim' was struck out for want of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.