Case 2400426/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss W Maj v Piotr Dominski — 2023
- Case reference
- 2400426/2022
- Decision date
- 2 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss W Maj
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing in Liverpool on 27 September 2023, before Employment Judge Buzzard sitting alone, Miss W Maj succeeded on her claim that there had been an unlawful deduction from wages after her employment transferred to Piotr Dominski following the dissolution of the company that had previously employed her. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £849.24 within 28 days.
The claimant's clothing allowance claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. Her unpaid bonus claim was based on an agreement the tribunal found had been tainted by illegality, so it held that the claim was not justiciable and dismissed it. The written notice also set out the interest position under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that interest would run at 8% per annum from 3 October 2023 if the sum remained unpaid after 14 days, but no separate interest sum was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that there had been an unlawful deduction from wages after the claimant's employment transferred to the respondent following dissolution of the previous employing company. | Upheld | — | £849 |
| Breach of contract | Claim in relation to a clothing allowance; dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for an unpaid bonus; the tribunal found the underlying agreement had been tainted by illegality and held the claim was not justiciable. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £849
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.