Case 2400430/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Maguire v Greater Manchester Combined Authority 2400430/22 — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400430/2022
- Decision date
- 22 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Maguire
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr D Maguire, had worked for the respondent since 1996 and was dismissed on 28 October 2021 after a complaint arising from an incident at a funeral on 18 June 2021. A race discrimination complaint was also raised in the proceedings, but it was withdrawn during the hearing, so the tribunal made no findings on that claim. The dismissal case concerned an allegation that the claimant said to NG, a subordinate colleague, words to the effect of 'I bet you feel at home here', while also looking up towards the trees and laughing or smiling.
The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant, the investigation manager, and the appeal manager, together with evidence from NG and two other colleagues, GK and PF. It accepted that there were some shortcomings in the investigation, including that some answers could have been pinned down more clearly and that the claimant's witnesses were not initially interviewed, but it found the investigation was still sufficient. Applying section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Burchell approach, and the band of reasonable responses test, the tribunal found the respondent had an honest and reasonable belief that misconduct had occurred.
The tribunal concluded that the respondent was entitled to rely on NG's account and the corroborative evidence it accepted from GK and PF, and it rejected the suggestion that the investigation or disciplinary process was biased. It held that the dismissal decision was within the range of reasonable responses because, on the facts the respondent found proved, a senior employee in uniform had made a racially discriminatory remark to a subordinate colleague at a funeral, in the presence of others. The appeal officer's reference to breach of trust and confidence was treated as consistent with the earlier dismissal reasoning, and the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. No award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Burchell test
- Iceland Frozen Foods Limited v Jones
- W Devis & Sons Limited v Atkins
- Taylor v OCS Group Limited
- Sainsburys Supermarkets PLC v Hitt
- Gray v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Tayeh v Barchester Health Care Limited
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.