Case 2400447/2025 · Employment Tribunal
S Yin v Share the Loaf Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2400447/2025
- Decision date
- 27 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Yin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £621.00 gross, comprising £460.00 for April 2024 pay and £161.00 for days worked on mandatory training on 22nd-23rd August 2024. The respondent was also found to have failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £230.00.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had acted in breach of the claimant's contract by failing to pay essential business expenses, with £12.39 outstanding at the date employment was terminated, and ordered damages of £12.39. No award was made in respect of impact on health, the tribunal recording that it does not have jurisdiction to award damages or compensation for stress, health issues or inconvenience in respect of these types of claims. The hearing listed for 21st May 2025 was cancelled. Notice was given that interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 applies, with the relevant decision day 27 March 2025 and the stipulated rate 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Comprises £460.00 for April 2024 pay and £161.00 for days worked on mandatory training on 22nd-23rd August 2024. | Upheld | — | £621 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £230 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to pay essential business expenses outstanding at termination. | Upheld | — | £12 |
| Other | Claim for impact on health: tribunal recorded it does not have jurisdiction to award damages or compensation for stress, health issues or inconvenience in respect of these types of claims. Classified as 'other' as it does not map to a §4.4 enum. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £863
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.