Case 2400483/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Yates v Cumbria Recycling Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400483/2022
- Decision date
- 3 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wheat REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Yates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that the claimant’s complaint for unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996, brought in relation to holiday pay, was dismissed upon withdrawal. No monetary award was made on that claim.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a statutory redundancy payment of £2,448.00. The written record does not set out detailed reasons for that award, and it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing. The tribunal made no order for costs.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant’s complaint for unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996, brought in relation to holiday pay, was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a statutory redundancy payment of £2,448.00. | Upheld | — | £2,448 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,448
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.