Case 2400483/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Barton v Steven Heyworth News HELD AT: Manchester — 2025
- Case reference
- 2400483/2024
- Decision date
- 13 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
- Panel members
- Mr J Flynn, Mrs A Ramsden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Barton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal listed the final hearing of Miss J Barton's complaints of unfair dismissal, protected disclosure detriment and other claims. The hearing had been re-listed after a preliminary hearing on 28 June 2024. At that earlier hearing, an order was made requiring the respondent to confirm the identity of the respondent and provide an address for the individual, if not a limited company, trading as the respondent and employing the claimant; the Tribunal recorded that the respondent did not comply with that order.
The Tribunal also recorded that both parties were required to confirm by 20 December 2024 that case management orders had been complied with and that they were ready for the hearing, but neither party did so. The Tribunal wrote to both parties on 3 January 2025 to ascertain the position. On 5 January 2025 the claimant emailed saying she was now homeless and would not attend because of 'weather and travel'; nothing was received from the respondent.
Neither party attended or was represented at the final hearing on 7 January 2025. After considering the information available and the reason given for the claimant's absence, the Tribunal applied rule 47 of the 2013 Rules of Procedure and dismissed the claimant's claims. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment described this as a complaint of 'protected disclosure detriment'. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The reasons referred generically to 'other claims' without identifying them further. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the 2013 Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.