Case 2400487/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Elson v New Platt Motors Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400487/2022
- Decision date
- 9 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Elson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment by consent. It recorded that New Platt Motors Ltd must pay Mr R Elson PS3,000 by 29 December 2022. The judgment states that it disposes of all complaints in the claim.
No liability findings were made and no part of the PS3,000 was allocated to any individual complaint. The tribunal noted that the parties had agreed between themselves sufficient information about the breakdown of the sum to make the necessary tax and National Insurance declarations.
The judgment also records that the claimant had not received any relevant welfare benefits, so regulations 7 and 8 of the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 did not apply. The accompanying notice stated that the relevant decision day was 9 December 2022, the calculation day was 10 December 2022, and the stipulated interest rate was 8% per annum if the sum remained unpaid after the relevant period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Judgment by consent. The tribunal recorded that the respondent must pay the claimant PS3,000 by 29 December 2022, and that the judgment disposed of all complaints in the claim. No particular sum was attributed to any particular complaint. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.