Case 2400490/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C McCann Mr P Stewart Mr A Dyson Miss E Case v Pure Business Group Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400490/2022
- Decision date
- 30 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C McCann Mr P Stewart Mr A Dyson Miss E Case
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimants' complaint that Pure Business Group Ltd failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded. The judgment was made under Rule 21 and recorded that the respondent was in administration.
The tribunal ordered a protective award under section 189(3) of the 1992 Act, payable to the claimants who were dismissed for redundancy from 2 November 2021. The protected period was 90 days beginning on 2 November 2021. The judgment also stated that the Recoupment Regulations apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Complaint that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal made a protective award under section 189(3) for remuneration for the period of 90 days beginning on 2 November 2021. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 189(3) TULRCA 1992
- Recoupment Regulations
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.