Case 2400498/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Bower v CW (No.1) Limited CW (No.1) t/a Caribou CW (No.1) – Group — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400498/2022
- Decision date
- 13 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Bower
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting under Employment Judge Slater, dealt with case numbers 2400498/2022, 2400503/2022 and 2400510/2022 together. The judgment records that the claims were struck out. No lay members are listed.
The reasons state that by a letter dated 9 August 2022 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claims. The short judgment does not record any remedy, liability findings on the merits, or any award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Classification follows the GOV.UK listing categories supplied in the case context. The judgment itself disposes of the claims together and does not separately discuss this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Classification follows the GOV.UK listing categories supplied in the case context. The judgment itself disposes of the claims together and does not separately discuss this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Classification follows the GOV.UK listing categories supplied in the case context. The judgment itself disposes of the claims together and does not separately discuss this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.