Case 2400501/2025 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mrs Bernadette Gallagher 2. Mr David Gallagher v Secretary of State for Business & Trade — 2025
- Case reference
- 2400501/2025
- Decision date
- 9 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. Mrs Bernadette Gallagher 2. Mr David Gallagher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants were founding directors and equal shareholders of Galltan Limited, which entered creditors' voluntary liquidation on 20 December 2024. They claimed payments from the Secretary of State following refusal of their applications, but the tribunal identified employee status under section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996 as the gateway issue. The burden was on the claimants to prove they were employees as well as directors at the relevant time.
The tribunal found there was no written contract of employment and limited evidence about any contractual terms or how the relationship operated in practice. The claimants did not attend the hearing for cross-examination, and the tribunal gave reduced weight to their brief witness statements. There were discrepancies in the evidence about pay and hours, no evidence of supervision, disciplinary or grievance procedures, timesheets, holiday records, or company documents such as board minutes or memoranda supporting an employment contract.
The tribunal accepted that directors and shareholders can also be employees, and that absence of ordinary control may not be fatal in a small family business. However, taking the available evidence as a whole, it was not satisfied that mutuality of obligation, sufficient control, or other relevant indicators of a contract of employment were proved. The tribunal held that the claimants were not employed by Galltan Limited within section 230 ERA 1996 at the relevant time, so their claims for payments by the respondent were not well founded and were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimants claimed redundancy payments and other monetary payments from the Secretary of State on Galltan Limited's insolvency. The tribunal decided the gateway issue of employment status and dismissed the claims because the claimants had not proved they were employees at the relevant time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Ready Mixed Concrete Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance
- mutuality of obligation
- Secretary of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Neufeld
- Clark v Clark Construction Initiatives Ltd
- Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills v Knight
- Eaton v Eaton Ltd and Secretary of State for Employment
- Fleming v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Rainford v Dorset Aquatics Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.