Case 2400529/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Speake v Advinia Health Care Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400529/2022
- Decision date
- 8 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Speake
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 17 May 2022, the Tribunal gave Miss S Speake an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the obligation to disclose documents to Advinia Health Care Limited by 22 April 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Miss Speake did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Phil Allen struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of liability and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not restate the substantive claim type, but the GOV.UK listing categorises the case as Unfair Dismissal. The claim was struck out because the claimant did not provide documents by 22 April 2022 and had not actively pursued the claim, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 17 May 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.