Case 2400548/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Fielding v Aspire 17 — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400548/2022
- Decision date
- 27 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dennehy Date
- Venue
- Manchester via Cloud Video Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Fielding
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mrs C Fielding's claim against Aspire 17 at Manchester via the Cloud Video Platform on 21 September 2022, with Employment Judge Dennehy sitting alone. The written judgment records that the claimant was represented in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The sole claim recorded in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal held that Mrs Fielding was not unfairly dismissed for gross misconduct, and the claim was dismissed. No separate remedy or monetary award was made.
The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. The published text therefore contains only the outcome and not the tribunal's fuller factual reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed for gross misconduct and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.