Case 2400637/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Halton-Barnes v Borough Council of Bolton — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400637/2020
- Decision date
- 4 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Halton-Barnes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms D Halton-Barnes brought proceedings against The Borough Council Of Bolton in case 2400637/2020. On 9 September 2020 Employment Judge Holmes issued a short judgment stating that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant.
The judgment contains no substantive findings on liability, no reasoning on the merits of any complaint, and no remedy award. The only outcome recorded is that the proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment text does not identify the individual cause of action, but the case listing category for this matter included breach of contract. The tribunal records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not identify the individual cause of action, but the case listing category for this matter included unfair dismissal. The tribunal records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.