Case 2400653/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Westwell v Deekay Recruitment Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400653/2020
- Decision date
- 3 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Westwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs K Westwell brought a claim against Deekay Recruitment Limited. The case was heard by Employment Judge Warren sitting alone in Liverpool on 27 August 2020, and the respondent did not attend. At the hearing, the respondent conceded that there had been an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages.
The tribunal therefore found that there had been an unlawful deduction from wages in the sum of £90.90 and ordered the respondent to pay that amount to the claimant. The judgment also records that the respondent's name was amended to Deekay Recruitment Limited on application by the respondent. The written record includes the standard interest notice, but no separate quantified interest award was made in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not attend. The unlawful deduction claim was conceded by the respondent, and the tribunal ordered payment of £90.90. | Upheld | — | £91 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £91
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.