Case 2400664/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Uddin v Single Resource Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400664/2020
- Decision date
- 30 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Uddin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 17 April 2020 before Employment Judge Ainscough sitting alone. The claimant, Mr S Uddin, appeared in person and the respondent, Single Resource Limited, was represented by Mr P Roberts, Solicitor.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, non-payment of redundancy payment, and unlawful deduction from wages were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of those claims.
No remedy was awarded, and the judgment contains no separate monetary assessment or liability findings beyond recording the withdrawal of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states this claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the non-payment of redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states this claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.