Case 2400713/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Kraj v Giromondo Limited (T/A Mont Blanc) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2400713/2024
- Decision date
- 8 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Thompson
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Kraj
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for a preliminary hearing on 19 March 2025 at Manchester Employment Tribunal to determine time limit points. Employment Judge Thompson sat alone. The claimant did not attend, and the clerk called the number recorded on the ET1 at 10:00am without response. The judge waited until 10:30am before calling the case on, and recorded that the claimant had filed a witness statement in advance but that it had not been served on the respondent and did not address why the claim had been presented out of time.
The respondent’s representative told the tribunal that, following the last hearing, the claimant had been paid holiday pay which had been agreed to be owed, in the amount of £2,432.86 before tax and national insurance. The respondent applied for dismissal under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the basis of the claimant’s non-attendance. In the absence of the claimant and any reason for that non-attendance, the tribunal dismissed the claim. The judgment also notes that the claimant could apply for reconsideration within 14 days if he considered it to be in the interests of justice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written reasons do not identify a substantive claim type beyond recording that the claim was dismissed under Rule 47 at a preliminary hearing. The judgment notes that holiday pay of £2,432.86 before tax and national insurance had already been paid, but it does not make a separate merits finding on that issue. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.