Case 2400728/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Kay v J T Care Homes Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400728/2020
- Decision date
- 9 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Kay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester hearing on 2 November 2020, before Employment Judge Warren, the claimant, Miss M Kay, was represented by Mr Bhatti and the respondent, J T Care Homes Ltd, was represented by Mr D Jones. The judgment is headed as a judgment on withdrawal by consent.
The claimant applied to withdraw her claims of breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, and failure to supply a statement of terms and conditions of employment under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment states that, on the respondent's application, those claims were dismissed. No substantive findings on the merits of the claims are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant applied to withdraw this claim; the judgment records that, on the respondent's application, it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant applied to withdraw this claim; the judgment records that, on the respondent's application, it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to supply a statement of terms and conditions of employment under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant applied to withdraw this claim; the judgment records that, on the respondent's application, it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.