Case 2400735/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Davies v Kildare Investment Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400735/2024
- Decision date
- 6 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningUnder Rule 21, Employment Judge Leach entered judgment for Ms E Davies against Kildare Investment Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of statutory sick pay and ordered payment of £700.16 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £185.60 gross.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s remaining holiday pay and ordered £327.68 gross. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax liabilities arising if the gross sums are paid without tax being deducted at source, and the hearing listed for 18 April 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of statutory sick pay. | Upheld | — | £700 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded. | Upheld | — | £186 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid remaining holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £328 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,213
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.