Case 2400751/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Griffiths v Thomas Cook Airlines Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2400751/2020
- Decision date
- 24 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M Griffiths
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 because the first respondent had not presented a response, the Secretary of State had made legal submissions, and the Official Receiver confirmed that the protective award claims would not be contested. The claim was permitted to proceed despite the first respondent being in compulsory liquidation.
The Tribunal found that the first respondent employed over 20 employees at the Manchester Airport site and that the claimant worked for Thomas Cook Airlines Limited. The first respondent went into compulsory liquidation on 23 September 2019, the Official Receiver was appointed early that morning, and the claimant was later notified that his employment was terminated with immediate effect.
The Tribunal found that there had been no proper warning, notice, or consultation with recognised trade unions or the claimant, and no employee representatives had been elected or appointed for consultation under section 188A of the 1992 Act. It held that the first respondent breached the duty under section 188 and made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 23 September 2019, subject to the recoupment provisions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The locked taxonomy has no specific protective award category; classified as other rather than redundancy_pay because the judgment did not adjudicate statutory redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.