Case 2400785/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A West v Northern Soul UK Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400785/2020
- Decision date
- 11 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A West
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Slater determined the case under Rule 21 and found that Northern Soul UK Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss A West's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,416.67 gross in respect of that deduction.
The judgment also records a further unauthorised deduction where the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday pay. The tribunal ordered payment of £186.30 gross for that item, making a total award of £1,602.97 gross.
The attached notice explains the tribunal interest regime, giving a relevant decision day of 11 May 2020, a calculation day of 12 May 2020, and a stipulated rate of 8%, but no separate interest amount is set out in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,416.67 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,417 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a further unauthorised deduction from wages arising from failure to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday pay, and ordered £186.30 gross. | Upheld | — | £186 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,603
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.