Case 2400799/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Cavanaugh v Folsana Pressed Sections Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2400799/2020
- Decision date
- 14 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Cavanaugh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on limitation. The claimant's employment ended on 21 November 2018, his appeal against dismissal was unsuccessful on 17 December 2018, and he began ACAS early conciliation on 15 February 2019. The early conciliation certificate issued on 15 March 2019 extended the primary time limit to 15 April 2019, but the tribunal recorded that the ET claim was not presented until 29 January 2020, around nine months late. The judgment disposed of claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, and detriment because of a protected disclosure.
The tribunal accepted medical evidence showing stress at work from September 2018, prescription of antidepressants and psychological therapy, and a deterioration in the claimant's health through August 2019. It accepted that he struggled to cope, resigned from subsequent employment, and that his wife had concerns about the impact of pursuing a claim on his health. On that evidence, it held that it was not reasonably practicable for him to present the claim within the extended primary limitation period ending 15 April 2019.
The tribunal nevertheless found that the claim was not brought within such further period as it considered reasonable. It noted that by August 2019 the claimant's health was improving, he had set up his own business, could travel and work, and was involved in his wife's tribunal proceedings, including correspondence, a witness statement, and attendance at her hearing in October 2019. The tribunal concluded that it would have been reasonable for him to lodge his own claim between August 2019 and January 2020, before a further deterioration recorded by his GP in January 2020. All claims were therefore dismissed as out of time.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed as out of time after the tribunal found the claim was not presented within a reasonable further period, even though it accepted the claimant's health made it not reasonably practicable to lodge by 15 April 2019. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed as out of time for the same reasons set out in the preliminary ruling on limitation. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed as out of time for the same reasons set out in the preliminary ruling on limitation. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The detriment claim based on protected disclosure was dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- section 111 ERA 1996
- section 23 ERA 1996
- section 48 ERA 1996
- section 207B ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable
- reasonable further period
- Schultz v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust v Williams
- Locke v Tabfine Ltd t/a Hands Music Centre
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.