Case 2400802/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alan Frith v Logistic Moves by Ollerton Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2400802/2024
- Decision date
- 21 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alan Frith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr Alan Frith’s breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 was well founded. It awarded damages of £5,771.41, made up of unpaid wages gross of £3,514.42 as at 9 August 2019, unpaid expenses of £1,457.50 as at 9 August 2019, and shortfalls in wages totalling £799.49 for 23 August 2019, 29 April 2022, 22 July 2022 and 24 February 2023.
It also found that Logistic Moves by Ollerton Limited failed to provide written particulars of employment contrary to s.1 and s.11 ERA 1996. Under s.38 Employment Act 2002, the tribunal awarded four weeks’ pay at £643 per week, producing a further award of £2,572.
The tribunal further found a breach of the obligation to provide itemised pay statements, but declined to make a monetary award for that issue. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £8,343.41 in total, subject to any lawful deduction for tax and national insurance if written confirmation is given.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. The damages comprised unpaid wages gross of £3,514.42, unpaid expenses of £1,457.50, and shortfalls in wages totalling £799.49 for 23 August 2019, 29 April 2022, 22 July 2022 and 24 February 2023. | Upheld | — | £5,771 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide written particulars of employment contrary to s.1 and s.11 ERA 1996. Under s.38 Employment Act 2002, it awarded four weeks' pay at £643 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,572 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements. It declined to make a monetary award on this issue. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,343
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- s.1 ERA 1996
- s.11 ERA 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.