Case 2400805/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lee Ellison v Meadow Mill Wood Finishings Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400805/2022
- Decision date
- 4 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lee Ellison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Lee Ellison brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Meadow Mill Wood Finishings Limited. The case was heard at Manchester on 21 July 2022 before Tribunal Judge Holt. The judgment records that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and that the unfair dismissal claim did not succeed, so the claim was dismissed.
The written record states that the claim was brought pursuant to s94 of the Employment Rights Act 1994. It does not set out the tribunal's full reasoning in writing because reasons were given orally at the hearing. The record also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless a request was made within 14 days of the written record being sent.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 4 August 2022. No monetary award is recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.