Case 2400813/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stuart Carey v Rayhome Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400813/2022
- Decision date
- 7 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCluskey REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Stuart Carey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing before Employment Judge McCluskey on 30 June 2022, the tribunal found Mr Stuart Carey’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages well founded and ordered Rayhome Ltd to pay £3,124 net. The judgment states that this figure was calculated from £3,624 net for September to November 2021 less £500 net already paid.
The tribunal also found the notice pay breach of contract claim well founded and ordered £1,115.08 net, calculated at £278.77 net for four weeks. It further upheld the accrued but untaken holiday claim and ordered £1,282.48 net, based on £55.76 net for 23 days.
The unfair constructive dismissal claim was also found well founded. The tribunal awarded £1,728 in total for that claim, comprising a £1,228 basic award and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The statutory redundancy payment claim was not well founded and did not succeed. The total award was £7,249.56, and the judgment records that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered £3,124 net, calculated as £3,624 net for September-November 2021 less £500 net already paid. | Upheld | — | £3,124 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim; the tribunal ordered £1,115.08 net, calculated at £278.77 net x 4 weeks. | Upheld | — | £1,115 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday claim; the tribunal ordered £1,282.48 net, calculated at £55.76 net x 23 days. | Upheld | — | £1,282 |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found unfair constructive dismissal well founded and awarded £1,728, made up of a £1,228 basic award and £500 loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £1,728 |
| Redundancy | The statutory redundancy payment claim was not well-founded and did not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,250
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,228
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.